Xeon Gold 5318Y vs E-2136

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2136
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
8.47
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
20.95
+147%

Xeon Gold 5318Y outperforms Xeon E-2136 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking890260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.56no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Eno data
Power efficiency10.0212.02
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date12 July 2018 (6 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1248
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size154 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data87 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2136 8.47
Xeon Gold 5318Y 20.95
+147%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2136 13460
Xeon Gold 5318Y 33283
+147%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.47 20.95
Recency 12 July 2018 6 April 2021
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon E-2136 has 106.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5318Y, on the other hand, has a 147.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5318Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2136 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2136 and Xeon Gold 5318Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2136
Xeon E-2136
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2136 or Xeon Gold 5318Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.