Celeron M 420 vs Xeon E-2136
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 887 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 27.05 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 10.03 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 12 July 2018 (6 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 533 MHz |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 154 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 27 Watt |
Xeon E-2136 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 420, on the other hand, has 196.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E-2136 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 420 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
