A4-9120C vs Xeon E-2136

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2136
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
8.47
+1469%
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54

Xeon E-2136 outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 1469% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8902840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.56no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon EAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency10.028.52
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date12 July 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3316
L1 cache384 KB160 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size154 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151BGA
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Virtualization,
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics P630AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2136 8.47
+1469%
A4-9120C 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2136 13460
+1484%
A4-9120C 850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.47 0.54
Integrated graphics card 6.39 1.17
Recency 12 July 2018 6 January 2019
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E-2136 has a 1468.5% higher aggregate performance score, 446.2% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2136 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2136 is a server/workstation processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2136 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2136
Xeon E-2136
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 77 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2136 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.