Xeon w9-3595X vs E-2124

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2124
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 71 Watt
4.44
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
63.66
+1334%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Xeon E-2124 by a whopping 1334% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking134813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.5520.18
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Eno data
Power efficiency5.8215.36
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 July 2018 (6 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3595X has 22% better value for money than Xeon E-2124.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads4120
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size126 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)71 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2124 4.44
Xeon w9-3595X 63.66
+1334%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2124 6927
Xeon w9-3595X 99239
+1333%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.44 63.66
Recency 12 July 2018 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 60
Threads 4 120
Power consumption (TDP) 71 Watt 385 Watt

Xeon E-2124 has 442.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 1333.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 1400% more physical cores and 2900% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2124 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2124 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2124
Xeon E-2124
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2124 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.