Xeon 6780E vs D-2843NT
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | no data | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $11,350 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 144 |
| Threads | 20 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 108 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA2579 | 4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 32 | 88 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2023 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 144 |
| Threads | 20 | 144 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 330 Watt |
Xeon D-2843NT has 312.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 1340% more physical cores and 620% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2843NT and Xeon 6780E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
