Ultra 7 165H vs Xeon D-2795NT

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2795NT
2022
20 cores / 40 threads, 110 Watt
17.92
+8.6%
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.50

Xeon D-2795NT outperforms Core Ultra 7 165H by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking346402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency15.4155.73
Architecture codenameno dataMeteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date1 January 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$460

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4022
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA2579Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes328
USB revision3.0no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-2795NT 17.92
+8.6%
Ultra 7 165H 16.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-2795NT 28463
+8.6%
Ultra 7 165H 26214

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.92 16.50
Recency 1 January 2022 14 December 2023
Physical cores 20 16
Threads 40 22
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon D-2795NT has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 25% more physical cores and 81.8% more threads.

Ultra 7 165H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 292.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H.

Be aware that Xeon D-2795NT is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 165H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2795NT and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2795NT
Xeon D-2795NT
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2795NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-2795NT or Core Ultra 7 165H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.