i7-14701TE vs Xeon D-2766NT
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | no data | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
Release date | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) | July 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 28 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 33 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA2579 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
QuickAssist | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 32 | 16 |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 14 | 8 |
Threads | 28 | 16 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon D-2766NT has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.
i7-14701TE, on the other hand, has 115.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-2766NT is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-14701TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2766NT and Core i7-14701TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.