Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Xeon D-2753NT
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 589 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 14.09 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Strix Halo (2025) |
Release date | 1 January 2022 (3 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Performance-cores | 12 | no data |
Threads | 24 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 5 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA2579 | FP11 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 87 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
QuickAssist | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 32 | 16 |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2022 | 6 January 2025 |
Physical cores | 12 | 8 |
Threads | 24 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 87 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon D-2753NT has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 58.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-2753NT is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2753NT and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.