Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs Xeon D-2752NTE
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Release date | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 20 November 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 24 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
L3 cache | 20 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FCBGA2579 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
QuickAssist | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 32 | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2022 | 20 November 2024 |
Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
Threads | 24 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon D-2752NTE has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 460% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-2752NTE is a server/workstation processor while Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2752NTE and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.