Xeon D-2775TE vs D-2146NT

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2146NT
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
7.39
Xeon D-2775TE
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt
17.19
+133%

Xeon D-2775TE outperforms Xeon D-2146NT by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking985373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.9723.88
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency8.7416.27
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release date7 February 2018 (6 years ago)24 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$641$1,751

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-2775TE has 200% better value for money than Xeon D-2146NT.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA2518FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size512 GB1 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3232
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-2146NT 7.39
Xeon D-2775TE 17.19
+133%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-2146NT 11736
Xeon D-2775TE 27299
+133%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.39 17.19
Recency 7 February 2018 24 February 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon D-2146NT has 25% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2775TE, on the other hand, has a 132.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon D-2775TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-2146NT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2146NT and Xeon D-2775TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2146NT
Xeon D-2146NT
Intel Xeon D-2775TE
Xeon D-2775TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-2146NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2775TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-2146NT or Xeon D-2775TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.