Ultra 7 265 vs Xeon D-1746TER
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 265 outperforms Xeon D-1746TER by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 790 | 150 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.46 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 13.91 | 42.68 |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 24 February 2022 (2 years ago) | January 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,069 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 10 | no data |
| Threads | 20 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | no data | 243 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2227 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 67 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.78 | 29.11 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 67 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ultra 7 265 has a 197.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 3.1% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1746TER in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon D-1746TER is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1746TER and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
