Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Xeon D-1734NT
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | no data | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FCBGA2227 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | XDNA 2 NPU |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| QuickAssist | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2022 | 4 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon D-1734NT has 10% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-1734NT is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1734NT and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
