Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon D-1732TE

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1732TE
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 52 Watt
8.97
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.20
+114%

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS outperforms Xeon D-1732TE by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking852298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.50no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.3240.38
Architecture codenameIce Lake-D (2022−2023)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date24 February 2022 (2 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$730no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed1.9 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2227FP7
Power consumption (TDP)52 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3.0no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1732TE 8.97
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS 19.20
+114%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1732TE 14254
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS 30494
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.97 19.20
Recency 24 February 2022 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 52 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a 114% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 15.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1732TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1732TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1732TE
Xeon D-1732TE
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1732TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1732TE or Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.