Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon D-1715TER

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1715TER
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 50 Watt
5.73
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55
+119%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Xeon D-1715TER by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1136619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency10.8569.86
Architecture codenameIce Lake-D (2022−2023)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date24 February 2022 (2 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2227Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revision3.0no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1715TER 5.73
Ultra 7 258V 12.55
+119%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1715TER 9104
Ultra 7 258V 19937
+119%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.73 12.55
Recency 24 February 2022 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 258V has a 119% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 194.1% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1715TER in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1715TER is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1715TER and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1715TER
Xeon D-1715TER
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1715TER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1715TER or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.