EPYC 4464P vs Xeon D-1637

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	134
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	66.29
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon D	no data
Power efficiency	no data	27.53
Architecture codename	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date	2 April 2019 (5 years ago)	21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$406	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	12	24
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	5.4 GHz
Bus type	DMI 2.0	no data
Multiplier	29	no data
L1 cache	384 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1.5 MB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	9 MB	32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Die size	246.24 mm2	2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	61 °C
Number of transistors	3200 Million	13,140 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCBGA1667	AM5
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
QuickAssist	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
GPIO	+	no data
AMT	SPS 3.0	no data
Quiet System	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
SGX	-	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4, DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	128 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	38.397 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version	2.0/3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	32	28
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	6	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	6	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	4x 10 GBE	no data
UART	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	2 April 2019	21 May 2024
Physical cores	6	12
Threads	12	24
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	105 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1637 and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---