Xeon W-3375 vs D-1627

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated86
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiencyno data13.04
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$202no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)38
Threads876
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
AMTSPS 3.0no data
Quiet System-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGX--
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375.

PCIe version2.0/3.04
PCI Express lanes3264
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x 10 GBEno data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 29 July 2021
Physical cores 4 38
Threads 8 76
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon D-1627 has 500% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3375, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 850% more physical cores and 850% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1627 and Xeon W-3375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1627
Xeon D-1627
Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1627 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1627 or Xeon W-3375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.