Xeon W-3365 vs D-1622

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1622
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 40 Watt
3.91
Xeon W-3365
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
37.17
+851%

Xeon W-3365 outperforms Xeon D-1622 by a whopping 851% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking143988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.03no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency9.2513.03
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$170no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
AMTSPS 3.0no data
Quiet System-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGX--
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365.

PCIe version2.0/3.04
PCI Express lanes3264
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1622 3.91
Xeon W-3365 37.17
+851%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1622 6205
Xeon W-3365 59038
+851%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.91 37.17
Recency 2 April 2019 29 July 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon D-1622 has 575% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3365, on the other hand, has a 850.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1622 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1622 and Xeon W-3365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1622
Xeon D-1622
Intel Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1622 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1622 or Xeon W-3365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.