EPYC 9475F vs Xeon D-1602

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.27no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency5.40no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$106$7,592

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size246.24 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1667SP5
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
AMTSPS 3.0no data
Quiet System-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version2.0/3.05.0
PCI Express lanes32128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon D-1602 has 1381.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1602
Xeon D-1602
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1602 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1602 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.