Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Xeon D-1581

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1581
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.39
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
14.53
+73.2%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon D-1581 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking899492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency12.1639.12
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date24 February 2016 (8 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed1.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size306.18 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS.

PCIe version2.0/3.04.0
PCI Express lanes2420
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1581 8.39
Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.53
+73.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1581 13282
Ryzen 5 7640HS 22996
+73.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.39 14.53
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon D-1581 has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7640HS, on the other hand, has a 73.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1581 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1581 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7640HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1581 and Ryzen 5 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon D-1581 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 476 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1581 or Ryzen 5 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.