i5-14400F vs Xeon D-1581

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1581
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.52
Core i5-14400F
2024
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.54
+94.1%

Core i5-14400F outperforms Xeon D-1581 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking899406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.87
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency12.1723.63
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date24 February 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size306.18 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
GPIO+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F.

PCIe version2.0/3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2416
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1581 8.52
i5-14400F 16.54
+94.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1581 13282
i5-14400F 25786
+94.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.52 16.54
Recency 24 February 2016 8 January 2024
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 16

Xeon D-1581 has 60% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i5-14400F, on the other hand, has a 94.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 years.

The Core i5-14400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1581 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1581 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-14400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1581 and Core i5-14400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581
Intel Core i5-14400F
Core i5-14400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon D-1581 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 545 votes

Rate Core i5-14400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1581 or Core i5-14400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.