Athlon 64 3400+ vs Xeon D-1540
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1054 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.80 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Xeon D | no data |
Power efficiency | 13.27 | no data |
Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
Release date | 9 March 2015 (9 years ago) | January 2001 (23 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $581 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Multiplier | 20 | no data |
L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 246.24 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 80 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 3200 Million | 105 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1667 | 754 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
GPIO | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+ are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.124 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+.
PCIe version | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 6 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | + | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
Threads | 16 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 89 Watt |
Xeon D-1540 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 97.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-1540 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 3400+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1540 and Athlon 64 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.