i5-10400F vs Xeon D-1537

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1537
2015
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
4.69
Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.20
+74.8%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon D-1537 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1271915
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.8122.94
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency12.6811.94
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date1 November 2015 (9 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$470$155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-10400F has 1167% better value for money than Xeon D-1537.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C72 °C
Number of transistors3,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe version2.0/3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2416
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1537 4.69
i5-10400F 8.20
+74.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1537 7444
i5-10400F 13029
+75%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.69 8.20
Recency 1 November 2015 30 April 2020
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon D-1537 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

i5-10400F, on the other hand, has a 74.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1537 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1537 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-10400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1537 and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1537
Xeon D-1537
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon D-1537 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13574 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1537 or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.