Xeon E5-2630L v3 vs D-1528

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1528
2015
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
4.46
Xeon E5-2630L v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 55 Watt
5.69
+27.6%

Xeon E5-2630L v3 outperforms Xeon D-1528 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13541148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.26no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency11.629.43
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date1 November 2015 (9 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$320no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size246.24 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data60 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/s59 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3.

PCIe version2.0/3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2440
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1528 4.46
Xeon E5-2630L v3 5.69
+27.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1528 6823
Xeon E5-2630L v3 8701
+27.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.46 5.69
Recency 1 November 2015 8 September 2014
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon D-1528 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2630L v3, on the other hand, has a 27.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The Xeon E5-2630L v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1528 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1528 and Xeon E5-2630L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1528
Xeon D-1528
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
Xeon E5-2630L v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-1528 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 256 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1528 or Xeon E5-2630L v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.