GX-210JA vs Xeon D-1528

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1356not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.23no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon DAMD
Power efficiency11.62no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Temash (2013)
Release date1 November 2015 (9 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$320no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1667FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA.

PCIe version2.0/3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1528 6823
+2651%
GX-210JA 248

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2015 23 May 2013
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon D-1528 has an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has 483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon D-1528 is a server/workstation processor while GX-210JA is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1528 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1528
Xeon D-1528
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-1528 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1528 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.