Xeon D-2843NT vs D-1524N

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Release date1 October 2018 (6 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.2 GHz
L3 cache6 MB15 MB
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFCBGA1667FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data32
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2018 1 October 2023
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 8 20
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon D-1524N has 77.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2843NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1524N and Xeon D-2843NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1524N
Xeon D-1524N
Intel Xeon D-2843NT
Xeon D-2843NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon D-1524N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon D-2843NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1524N or Xeon D-2843NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.