EPYC 9375F vs Xeon D-1524N

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date1 October 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,306

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCBGA1667SP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon D-1524N has 611.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1524N and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1524N
Xeon D-1524N
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon D-1524N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1524N or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.