i5-10500T vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Bronze 3206R outperforms Core i5-10500T by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1020 | 1053 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 7.57 | 17.17 |
Release date | 1 January 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
L3 cache | 11 MB | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA1200 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
SIPP | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.15 GHz |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2160@30Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.93 | 6.47 |
Recency | 1 January 2020 | 1 April 2020 |
Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Xeon Bronze 3206R has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores.
i5-10500T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 50% more threads, and 142.9% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T.
Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3206R is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-10500T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3206R and Core i5-10500T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.