Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon Bronze 3204

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3204
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
3.08
+107%
Celeron G6900TE
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.49

Xeon Bronze 3204 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16232144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.25no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Bronzeno data
Power efficiency3.434.03
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache384 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8.25 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA36471700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Bronze 3204 3.08
+107%
Celeron G6900TE 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3204 4886
+106%
Celeron G6900TE 2373

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.08 1.49
Recency 2 April 2019 4 January 2022
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Bronze 3204 has a 106.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Celeron G6900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 142.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Bronze 3204 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3204 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3204 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3204
Xeon Bronze 3204
Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3204 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Bronze 3204 or Celeron G6900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.