Xeon Platinum 8256 vs Bronze 3104

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3104
2017
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
2.90
Xeon Platinum 8256
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
10.97
+278%

Xeon Platinum 8256 outperforms Xeon Bronze 3104 by a whopping 278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1672730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.301.89
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon BronzeIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency3.119.53
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213$7,007

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Bronze 3104 has 128% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8256.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier1738
L1 cache384 KB256 KB
L2 cache6 MB4 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB16.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C72 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Bronze 3104 2.90
Xeon Platinum 8256 10.97
+278%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3104 4437
Xeon Platinum 8256 16787
+278%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 10.97
Recency 11 July 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon Bronze 3104 has 50% more physical cores, and 23.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8256, on the other hand, has a 278.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 33.3% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8256 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3104 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3104 and Xeon Platinum 8256, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
Xeon Bronze 3104
Intel Xeon Platinum 8256
Xeon Platinum 8256

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 15 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Bronze 3104 or Xeon Platinum 8256, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.