Ryzen Threadripper 3980X vs Xeon 7130N
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
Architecture codename | Tulsa (2006) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
Release date | August 2006 (18 years ago) | 14 November 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 96 |
Base clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.17 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 32 |
L1 cache | 0 KB | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 128 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
Die size | 435 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 69 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1328 million | 19,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | PPGA604 | TR4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 102.403 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 48 |
Threads | 4 | 96 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 280 Watt |
Xeon 7130N has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 7130N is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3980X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 7130N and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.