Ryzen 3 3300 vs Xeon 7120N
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Tulsa (2006) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | August 2006 (18 years ago) | March 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 435 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 60 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1328 million | 4800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA604 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 50 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3300 has 200% more physical cores, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 90% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 7120N is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 7120N and Ryzen 3 3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
