Ryzen 4700S vs Xeon 6710E
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Sierra Forest (2024) | Cardinal (2021) |
| Release date | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) | 26 June 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,749 | $399 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 308 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 4710 | AMD BGA 2197 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | unknown Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2024 | 26 June 2021 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 8 |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon 6710E has an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 4700S, on the other hand, has 215.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 4700S is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 6710E and Ryzen 4700S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
