EPYC 8534PN vs Xeon 6710E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSierra Forest (2024)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2024 (less than a year ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,749$5,450

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache96 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data4x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °C85 °C
Number of transistorsno data35,500 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket4710SP6
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt175 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes8896

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2024 18 September 2023
Threads 64 128
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 175 Watt

Xeon 6710E has an age advantage of 8 months.

EPYC 8534PN, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 17.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 6710E and EPYC 8534PN, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E
AMD EPYC 8534PN
EPYC 8534PN

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8534PN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 6710E or EPYC 8534PN, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.