Pentium E6300 vs Xeon 5160

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.61
Pentium E6300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.65
+6.6%

Pentium E6300 outperforms Xeon 5160 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27882748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.153.59
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.720.95
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)9 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$22$40

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium E6300 has 67% better value for money than Xeon 5160.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache0 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA771LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5160 0.61
Pentium E6300 0.65
+6.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5160 963
Pentium E6300 1032
+7.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon 5160 378
+28.1%
Pentium E6300 295

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon 5160 571
+22.8%
Pentium E6300 465

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.65
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium E6300 has a 6.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300.

Be aware that Xeon 5160 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium E6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Pentium E6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
Intel Pentium E6300
Pentium E6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 78 votes

Rate Pentium E6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Pentium E6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.