i3-330E vs Xeon 5160

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.61
Core i3-330E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.79
+29.5%

Core i3-330E outperforms Xeon 5160 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28032624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.15no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency0.722.14
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$22$177

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache0 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °C90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA771BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8.79 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5160 0.61
i3-330E 0.79
+29.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5160 963
i3-330E 1260
+30.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.79
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

i3-330E has a 29.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-330E is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5160 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 5160 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-330E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Core i3-330E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
Intel Core i3-330E
Core i3-330E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Core i3-330E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.