Ultra 7 265 vs Xeon 5160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2799not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.15no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.72no data
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$22no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache0 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA7711851
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265 has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon 5160 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.