EPYC 7262 vs Xeon 5148

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5148
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 40 Watt
0.57
EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.08
+2195%

EPYC 7262 outperforms Xeon 5148 by a whopping 2195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2809571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.059.66
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.357.99
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9$575

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7262 has 217% better value for money than Xeon 5148.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache0 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
Socket771SP3
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5148 0.57
EPYC 7262 13.08
+2195%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5148 912
EPYC 7262 20779
+2178%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 13.08
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon 5148 has 287.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7262, on the other hand, has a 2194.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7262 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5148 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5148 and EPYC 7262, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5148
Xeon 5148
AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 5148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5148 or EPYC 7262, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.