Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 5140

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5140
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.55
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
59.06
+10638%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms Xeon 5140 by a whopping 10638% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking283520
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.27no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.7920.32
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$15no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)38
Threads276
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache0 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA771FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5140 0.55
Xeon Platinum 8368 59.06
+10638%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5140 857
Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+10641%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 59.06
Physical cores 2 38
Threads 2 76
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon 5140 has 315.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368, on the other hand, has a 10638.2% higher aggregate performance score, 1800% more physical cores and 3700% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5140 and Xeon Platinum 8368, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5140
Xeon 5140
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon 5140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 98 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5140 or Xeon Platinum 8368, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.