Opteron 240 EE vs Xeon 5110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)February 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$20no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache0 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA771940
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon 5110 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 240 EE, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5110 and Opteron 240 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5110
Xeon 5110
AMD Opteron 240 EE
Opteron 240 EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 26 votes

Rate Xeon 5110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 240 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5110 or Opteron 240 EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.