Celeron 220 vs Xeon 5063
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 5063 and Celeron 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Dempsey (2006) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| Release date | May 2006 (18 years ago) | October 2007 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5063 and Celeron 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 77 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 105 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5063 and Celeron 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 771 | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 19 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5063 and Celeron 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 19 Watt |
Xeon 5063 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron 220, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 5063 and Celeron 220. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 5063 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 220 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5063 and Celeron 220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
