Xeon 3.2 vs 5060
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 5060 and Xeon 3.2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Dempsey (2006) | Irwindale (2004) |
| Release date | May 2006 (18 years ago) | June 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5060 and Xeon 3.2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 169 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5060 and Xeon 3.2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 771 | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5060 and Xeon 3.2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5060 and Xeon 3.2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 135 Watt |
Xeon 5060 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 5060 and Xeon 3.2. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5060 and Xeon 3.2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
