Athlon 300U vs Xeon 5060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Architecture codenameDempsey (2006)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache0 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket771AM4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon 300U has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon 5060 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5060 and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5060
Xeon 5060
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 454 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5060 or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.