Xeon E3-1501M v6 vs 5050
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Mobile workstation |
Series | no data | Intel Xeon E3 |
Architecture codename | Dempsey (2006) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
Release date | May 2006 (18 years ago) | 12 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 29 |
L1 cache | 0 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | PLGA771 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-2400 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics P630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon E3-1501M v6 has 100% more physical cores, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 111.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 5050 is a server/workstation processor while Xeon E3-1501M v6 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5050 and Xeon E3-1501M v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.