Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Xeon 5040
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 224 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Apple M3 |
Power efficiency | no data | 27.94 |
Architecture codename | Dempsey (2006) | no data |
Release date | May 2006 (18 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 14 |
Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.748 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
L1 cache | 0 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 92000 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | PLGA771 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 78 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
Threads | 4 | 14 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 78 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 14-Core has 600% more physical cores and 250% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 21.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 5040 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5040 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.