Ryzen 5 5600H vs Xeon 3.20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 3.20
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 97 Watt
0.30
Ryzen 5 5600H
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
10.68
+3460%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Xeon 3.20 by a whopping 3460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 5 5600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3099729
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency0.2922.46
Architecture codenameGallatin (2003−2004)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release dateOctober 2003 (21 year ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 5 5600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache8 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache2 MB16 MB
Chip lithography130 nm7 nm
Die size237 mm2no data
Number of transistors286 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 5 5600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
Socket604FP6
Power consumption (TDP)97 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 5 5600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 5 5600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 5 5600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 3.20 0.30
Ryzen 5 5600H 10.68
+3460%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 3.20 478
Ryzen 5 5600H 16961
+3448%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 10.68
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 97 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 5 5600H has a 3460% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process, and 115.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 5600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 3.20 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 3.20 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5600H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 5 5600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 3.20
Xeon 3.20
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Ryzen 5 5600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon 3.20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4588 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 3.20 or Ryzen 5 5600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.