Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Xeon 3.20
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1011 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.00 |
| Architecture codename | Gallatin (2003−2004) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | October 2003 (21 year ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 38 |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 237 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 286 million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 604 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 49.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 3.20 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.20 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
