Xeon Platinum 8470Q vs 3.06
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3066 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.33 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gallatin (2003−2004) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | March 2003 (21 year ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,410 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 52 |
| Threads | 1 | 104 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.07 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16K | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 105 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 237 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 57 °C |
| Number of transistors | 286 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | 604 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 52 |
| Threads | 1 | 104 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 350 Watt |
Xeon 3.06 has 260.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8470Q, on the other hand, has 5100% more physical cores and 10300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.06 and Xeon Platinum 8470Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
