HD Graphics 620 vs Xeon 3.0
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 3.0 and HD Graphics 620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
| Architecture codename | Irwindale (2004) | Gen9.5 |
| Release date | June 2004 (20 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 3.0 and HD Graphics 620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 0.35 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 3.0 and HD Graphics 620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 604 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.0 and HD Graphics 620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.0 and HD Graphics 620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
HD Graphics 620 has a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.0 and HD Graphics 620. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 3.0 is a server/workstation processor while HD Graphics 620 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.0 and HD Graphics 620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
