Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 258 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | VIA | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.14 |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 40 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 May 2011 | 14 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 280 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 937% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
