A6-3620 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A6-3620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesVIAno data
Power efficiencyno data1.70
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A6-3620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size132 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A6-3620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFM1
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A6-3620 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A6-3620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6530D

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2011 20 December 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 65 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 140.7% lower power consumption.

A6-3620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A6-3620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while A6-3620 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A6-3620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
AMD A6-3620
A6-3620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 69 votes

Rate A6-3620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or A6-3620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.